Measuring Polarization in Online Debates
نویسندگان
چکیده
Social networks can be a very successful tool to engage users discuss relevant topics for society. However, there are also some dangers that associated with them, such as the emergence of polarization in online discussions. Recently, has been growing interest try understand this phenomenon, consider harmful concerning building healthy society which citizens get used polite discussions and even listening opinions may different from theirs. In work, we face problem defining precise measure quantify meaningful way level present an discussion. We focus on Reddit social network, given its primary is foster discussions, contrast other have uses. Our based two characteristics discussion: existence balanced bipartition discussion, where one partition contains mainly agreement (regarding topic discussion) disagreement, degree negativity sentiment interactions between these groups users. how affect value our measure, finally perform empirical evaluation over sets about diverse classes topics. results seem indicate capture differences further understood when analyzing values factors define measure.
منابع مشابه
Recognizing Stances in Online Debates
This paper presents an unsupervised opinion analysis method for debate-side classification, i.e., recognizing which stance a person is taking in an online debate. In order to handle the complexities of this genre, we mine the web to learn associations that are indicative of opinion stances in debates. We combine this knowledge with discourse information, and formulate the debate side classifica...
متن کاملMeasuring and Moderating Opinion Polarization in Online Social Networks
vii Εκτεταμένη Περίληψη viii
متن کاملAutomatic Summarization of Online Debates
Debate summarization is one of the novel and challenging research areas in automatic text summarization which has been largely unexplored. In this paper, we develop a debate summarization pipeline to summarize key topics which are discussed or argued in the two opposing sides of online debates. We view that the generation of debate summaries can be achieved by clustering, cluster labeling, and ...
متن کاملUnshared task: (Dis)agreement in online debates
Topic-independent expressions for conveying agreement and disagreement were annotated in a corpus of web forum debates, in order to evaluate a classifier trained to detect these two categories. Among the 175 expressions annotated in the evaluation set, 163 were unique, which shows that there is large variation in expressions used. This variation might be one of the reasons why the task of autom...
متن کاملAn Investigation of the Online Farsi Translation of Metadiscourse Markers in American Presidential Debates
The term metadiscourse rarely appears in translation studies despite the continuously growing body of research on discourse markers in different genres and through various perspectives. Translation as a product that needs to observe such markers for their communicative power and contribution to the overall coherence of a text within a context has not been satisfactorily studied. Motivated by su...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Applied sciences
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2076-3417']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411879